Bayesian Engine v3.0

AI-guided process
optimization

Reduce experiments by 90% with Bayesian optimization. Our engine learns from each round, navigating high-dimensional parameter spaces to converge on optimal conditions Faster than DOE or traditional approaches.

Round 1 — Recommendations
Temperature65 °C
Ligand
PPh3RuPhosSPhosXPhosdppfPCy3PtBu3
Catalyst loading2.0 mol%
Solvent
DioxaneTHFDMFDMADMSO
Time6.0 h
Predicted yield61.4%

Platform benchmarks

50–90%

Fewer experiments

Reduction in experiments required compared to traditional DOE and one-factor-at-a-time approaches.

10x

Faster discovery

Faster condition discovery versus grid search or random screening on benchmark reaction datasets.

<5 min

Time to first result

From uploading your first batch of experiments to receiving AI-guided recommendations.

Case Study 01

Direct C–H arylation

With 1728 possible reaction condition combinations, Chemetrian optimization software guides which experiments to perform to achieve >95% yield within 17 experiments, and >98% yield in 22 experiments.

01
The reaction
Substrate
+
Aryl halide
Catalyst[PdCl(allyl)]₂ (2.25 mol%)
Ligand5.0 mol%
Base3.0 equiv
Time24 h
Product
02
The design space
1,728possible reaction
combinations

Temperature

90 °C105 °C120 °C

Concentration

57 mM100 mM153 mM

Solvents

DMAcp-xyleneBuOAcBuCN

Ligands

PPh₃XPhosBrettPhosPCy₃GarlosPhos

Bases

KOAcKOPivCsOAcCsOPivKOOAc
03
The results
<1%

of combinations tested

17

expts to >95% yield

22

expts to >98% yield

Max % yield — experiment progress
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3

Chemetrian Bayesian Optimization demonstrated on B. J. Shields et al., Nature 2021, 590, 89.

Why Bayesian Optimization?

How BO compares to Design of Experiments

Bayesian optimization learns from each experiment and intelligently suggests the next best experiment to run. Achieves equal or superior outcomes with dramatically fewer trials.

Optimization speed vs. exhaustive experimentation

Bayesian Optimization

Finds optimal conditions with the fewest experiments. Decrease experiments by 50–90% compared to traditional screening.

Design of Experiments

Runs a full pre-defined matrix. Valuable when comprehensive documentation is required, such as regulatory filings or process validation.

Adaptive vs. pre-specified

Bayesian Optimization

Updates its model after every batch and redirects experiments in real time. Each round learns from the last, converging faster.

Design of Experiments

Requires the full experimental design to be locked in before a single reaction is run. No mid-course corrections.

Native handling of categorical variables

Bayesian Optimization

Encodes all variable types, numerical and categorical (base, ligand, solvent), directly into the ML model in a single optimization.

Design of Experiments

Designed for continuous variables. Categorical variables must be screened independently since they can't be included in the model.

Case Study 02

Suzuki–Miyaura coupling

With 1728 possible reaction condition combinations, Chemetrian optimization software guides which experiments to perform to achieve >95% yield within 17 experiments, and >95% yield in 30 experiments.

01
The reaction
Boronate
+
Aryl halide
CatalystPd(OAc)₂ (6.25 mol%)
Ligand12.5 mol%
Base2.5 equiv
Time1 min @ 100 °C
Product
02
The design space
924possible reaction
combinations

B(X)ₙ

B(OH)₂BpinBF₃K

Ligands

AmPhosCataCXium APCy₃PPh₃P(o-tol)₃Pt-Bu₃SPhosXPhosXantPhosdppfdtbpf

Bases

Et₃NLiOt-BuCsFK₃PO₄KOHNaHCO₃NaOH

Solvents

MeOHTHFMeCNDMF
03
The results
<3%

of combinations tested

17

expts to >95% yield

30

expts to >98% yield

Max % yield — experiment progress
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3

Chemetrian Bayesian Optimization demonstrated on Perera et al., Science 2018, 359, 429.

Built for interpretability

See exactly why the model made each recommendation

Every optimization run surfaces the visualizations you need to trust and communicate your results. From feature analysis to parity plots to 3D response surfaces.

Explainability

SHAP Analysis

Understand which features drive your model predictions with interactive SHAP value beeswarm plots.

SHAP value plot showing feature importance
Optimization

Multi-Dimensional Optimization

AI models navigate high-dimensional parameter spaces, learning from each experiment to converge on optimal conditions faster.

3D optimization surface for yield prediction
Model

Surrogate Model Visualization

Visualize the learned objective function per feature. See the mean prediction with confidence bands and where the model suggests exploring next.

Surrogate Model — Temperature
Observations
Suggested
0%25%50%75%100%Temperature (°C)

Process optimization

Agentic AI literature suggestions

Agentic literature search is an AI-driven approach that uses large language models (LLMs) combined with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to analyze and synthesize information from millions of chemistry publications. Instead of manually reviewing papers, the system autonomously searches the literature based on key aspects of a reaction campaign such as starting materials, target structures or reaction class and identifies experimentally validated conditions.

The model iteratively refines its search, evaluates supporting evidence across sources, and proposes promising reaction conditions while citing the underlying literature and explaining why each recommendation is a strong candidate. This enables chemists to rapidly surface actionable insights from a database of chemical knowledge translating literature into informed reaction conditions and parameter spaces for optimization.

Configure Literature Search
Configure your literature search parameters to find relevant reaction conditions and inspiration.
Workflow: Results will be saved to "Lit Search BH optimization"
Note: This process typically takes 20-30 minutes to complete. The system will analyze your parameters to suggest additional reaction conditions based on literature research.
Starting Materials
NC1=NC(C2=CC=CN=C2)=CC=N1
CC1=C(C=C(C=C1)NC(OCC2=CC=CC=C2)=O)Br
Product Structure (Optional)
CC1=C(NC2=NC(C3=CC=CN=C3)=CC=N2)C=C(C=C1)NC(OCC4=CC=CC=C4)=O
Current Features
Choose the number of suggested conditions for each feature
solventType: Categorical
5
phosphine_ligandType: Categorical
10
baseType: Categorical
6
temperatureType: Continuous
Suggesting a Range
Cancel
Start Literature Search
Literature Search Results
Summary
Details
References
4Your Parameters
4New Suggestions
Your Parameters – Refined Suggestions

Optimized values for your existing reaction conditions

solvent
Discrete Values:
toluene1,4-dioxaneCPME2-MeTHFtert-amyl alcohol
Other Options:
toluene/t-BuOH (5:1)DMFMeCN/PhMe (flow-like)
phosphine_ligand
Discrete Values:
BrettPhostBuBrettPhosRuPhosXPhosSPhosXantPhosBippyPhosDavePhosMor-DalPhosAdBrettPhos
Other Options:
P(tBu)3(±)-BINAP
base
Discrete Values:
NaOtBuKOtBuCs2CO3K3PO4NaOPhDBU
Other Options:
NaOMeLHMDSK2CO3
temperature
Continuous Range:70 to 120 °C
Discrete Values:
100 °C115 °C
Other Options:
140 °C (flow forcing)65 °C (if very active catalyst)

Ready to optimize your reactions?

Upload your first batch of experiments and let the Bayesian engine guide you to optimal conditions.